Fiund / Speech & conversation data
Source documentation.
A clearly defined permission scope.
Review the proposed recordings, relevant parties and intended uses before agreeing a speech-data project.
A clear review process
What to establish for your project.
Identify the actual source
Establish the original recording, source session, published edits and any participant tracks being considered. Stable identifiers help connect technical review, documentation and the proposed delivery.
Understand the relevant contributors
Review the parties involved in the recording and any music, advertising, licensed inserts or other third-party components. A podcast’s public availability does not establish the permission scope for a particular AI use.
State the intended model use
Explain training, fine-tuning, evaluation, synthesis and any planned downstream releases. Named-voice or other sensitive use cases should be raised explicitly so the required documentation and restrictions can be discussed for the selected source.
Define the review evidence
Discuss available source records, participant documentation, exclusions, derivative relationships and file-level metadata. Review a representative sample against the technical brief while keeping source and permission questions explicit.
Agree the commercial engagement
Selected material, permitted uses, restrictions, preparation, acceptance, delivery and commercial terms belong in a project-specific agreement. Your legal and procurement teams should review the actual supporting documents and proposed scope before approving the engagement.
Founder, Fiund
Your project contact
For research, engineering & procurement teams
A direct conversation.
A well-defined next step.
Speak directly with Jaeden Schafer about the recordings, documentation and preparation your speech-data project needs. Start with the model task and agree on a clear source-review and commercial scope.